LAW ON SUCCESSION | MENDOZA VS. IAC, G.R. NO. L-63132, JULY 30, 1987

MENDOZA VS. IAC,

G.R. NO. L-63132, JULY 30, 1987

 

TOPIC/DOCTRINE

Recognition or acknowledgment of a natural child under said Code must be made in a record of birth, a will, a statement before a court of record, or in some other public document.

 

FACTS

In the case at bar, the only document presented by Modesta Gabuya to prove that she was recognized by her mother was the certificate of birth and baptism signed by Rev. Fr. Filomeno Singson, Assistant Parish Priest of Pardo, Cebu City, stating therein that Modesta Gabuya is an illegitimate daughter of Nicolasa Gabuya.

 

ISSUE

Whether Modesta Gabuya, not having been acknowledged in the manner provided by law by her mother, Nicolasa, was entitled to succeed the latter.

 

RULING

No.

The court held that this petition must fail is a foregone conclusion. Modesta Gabuya, not having been acknowledged in the manner provided by law by her mother, Nicolasa, was not entitled to succeed the latter. The extrajudicial settlement of the estate of Evaristo Gabuya is, therefore, null and void insofar as Modesta Gabuya is concerned per Article 1105 of the New Civil Code which states: "A partition which includes a person believed to be an heir, but who is not, shall be void only with respect to such person." Since the ownership of the one-half [1/2] pro indiviso portion of Lot No. 3597 never passed on to Modesta Gabuya, it follows that the sale thereof to petitioners-spouses Elias and Eustiquia Mendoza is likewise null and void. Acknowledged natural children were given limited successional rights in that they were entitled to inherit only from the acknowledging parent [Art. 134], while illegitimate children who did not possess the status of natural children had no successional rights whatsoever [Art. 139] The latter were only entitled to support. Adopted children become heirs of the adopting parents only if the adopting parents had agreed to confer the adopted children such rights in the deed of adoption, or had instituted them as heirs in a will. Recognition or acknowledgment of a natural child under said Code must be made in a record of birth, a will, a statement before a court of record, or in some other public document.In the case at bar, the only document presented by Modesta Gabuya to prove that she was recognized by her mother was the certificate of birth and baptism signed by Rev. Fr. Filomeno Singson, Assistant Parish Priest of Pardo, Cebu City, stating therein that Modesta Gabuya is an illegitimate daughter of Nicolasa Gabuya. 10 However, Philippine jurisprudence is consistent and uniform in ruling that the canonical certificate of baptism is not sufficient to prove recognition. The rationale for this ruling, enunciated in the case of Cid v. Burnaman, 24 SCRA 434, is that while the baptismal certificate in the parish records was a public document before the effectivity of General Order No. 68 and Act 190, this certificate did not constitute a sufficient act of acknowledgment, since the latter must be executed by the child’s father or mother, and the parish priest can not acknowledge in their stead.







Popular posts from this blog

CRIMINAL LAW II CASE DIGEST/ BACLAYON V. MUTIA, 129 SCRA 148

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I CASE DIGEST | THE DIOCESE OF BACOLOD V. COMELEC G.R. No. 205728, January 21, 2015

CREDIT TRANSACTIONS CASE DIGEST/ BPI FAMILY BANK VS. FRANCO/ G. R. NO. 123498/ 23 NOVEMBER 2007

REMEDIAL LAW | Riviera Golf Club v. CCA G.R. No. 173783, June 17 2015

CREDIT TRANSACTION CASE DIGEST/ QUINTOS VS. BECK/ 69 PHIL. 108 (1939)

CREDIT TRANSACTION CASE DIGEST/ MINA VS. PASCUAL/ 25 PHIL. 540 (1923)

LEGAL ETHICS | MAURICIO C. ULEP VS. THE LEGAL CLINIC, INC Bar Matter No. 553. June 17, 1993

LAW ON PROPERTY | ACOSTA V. OCHOA, ET AL., G.R. NO. 211559; G.R. NO. 215634, OCTOBER 15, 2019

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION | HYGIENIC PACKAGING CORPORATION VS. NUTRI-ASIA, INC ., G.R. NO. 201302, JANUARY 23, 2019

CRIMINAL LAW II CASE DIGEST/ BALA V. MARTINEZ, 181 SCRA 459