ADMNISTRATIVE LAW | MAQUILING VS. COMELEC G.R. NO. 195649, APRIL 16, 2013
MAQUILING VS. COMELEC
G.R. NO. 195649, APRIL 16, 2013
TOPIC/DOCTRINE
While those who acquire dual citizenship by choice
are afforded the right of suffrage, those who seek election or appointment to
public office are required to renounce their foreign citizenship to be
deserving of the public trust. Holding public office demands full and undivided
allegiance to the Republic and to no other.
FACTS
Rommel Arnado is a natural bon Filipino citizen who lost his citizenship
upon his naturalization as an American citizen. Subsequently, he renounced his
American citizenship and ran as a Mayor of Lanao del Norte. After he was
proclaimed the winner, the COMELEC anulled such proclamation and consequently
directed that the order of succession under the Local Government Code be
followed. Maquiling, another candidate for mayor, and who garnered the second
highest number of votes in the election intervened the case, claims that he
should be proclaimed as the winner.
ISSUE
Whether Arnedo is disqualified.
Whether Maguiling should succeed Arnedo.
RULING
Yes.
The court ruled that while
those who acquire dual citizenship by choice are afforded the right of
suffrage, those who seek election or appointment to public office are required
to renounce their foreign citizenship to be deserving of the public trust.
Holding public office demands full and undivided allegiance to the Republic and
to no other. The citizenship requirement for elective public office is a
continuing one. It must be possessed not just at the time of the renunciation
of the foreign citizenship but continuously. Any act which violates the oath of
renunciation opens the citizenship issue to attack. When a person who is not
qualified is voted for and eventually garners the highest number of votes, even
the will of the electorate expressed through the ballot cannot cure the defect
in the qualifications of the candidate. To rule otherwise is to trample upon
and rent asunder the very law that sets forth the qualifications and
disqualifications of candidates.
Here,
the court ruled that Arnado, by using his US passport after renouncing his
American citizenship, has recanted the same Oath of Renunciation he took.
Section 40(d) of the Local Government Code applies to his situation. He is
disqualified not only from holding the public office but even from becoming a
candidate in the May 2010 elections. The disqualifying circumstance affecting Arnado is his citizenship.
Arnado was both a Filipino and an American citizen when he filed his
certificate of candidacy. He was a dual citizen disqualified to run for public
office based on Section 40(d) of the Local Government Code; The affirmation of
Arnado’s disqualification, although made long after the elections, reaches back
to the filing of the certificate of candidacy.
No.
The court ruled that Arnado is declared to be not a
candidate at all in the May 2010 elections. When there are participants who
turn out to be ineligible, their victory is voided and the laurel is awarded to
the next in rank who does not possess any of the disqualifications nor lacks
any of the qualifications set in the rules to be eligible as candidates.